Labeling for server stats #296
Replies: 5 comments 1 reply
-
RobinMCNetwork wrote at Jun 22 2016 18:54:06 UTC: zacharee It might have to do something with the fact that memory is not mesured in neither gigabytes nor gigabits, but in gibibytes. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
zacharee wrote at Jun 22 2016 18:54:06 UTC: But then wouldn't it be MiB? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
zacharee wrote at Jun 22 2016 18:54:06 UTC: But that still doesn't really explain why memory is allocated in |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
puffrfish wrote at Jun 22 2016 18:54:06 UTC: There are typos all throughout the PufferPanel codebase, and this is likely one of them. I am pretty certain it is not measured in megabits. To explain why a server could be using more RAM than what was set in the panel, we only limit memory usage with -Xmx for non-dockerized servers. It is possible that a program can use more memory than what is set with -Xmx, but it generally stays around that amount. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
zacharee wrote at Jun 22 2016 18:54:06 UTC: Ah, OK. Thanks for the explanation. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
zacharee wrote at Jun 22 2016 18:54:06 UTC:
So after using this wrapper for I think a year, I've noticed something a little strange.
On the Statistics page for any server, the memory graph Y-axis is
Memory Usage (Mb)
. I've always takenMb
to meanmegabit
, as in 1/8th of a megabyte. I started questioning this labeling when I saw that a server with 1024MB allocated was using 1225Mb
.Is the
Mb
meant to mean megabit or does it meanMB
in this case?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions